|

BACKGROUND
Brain metastases, unfortunately are
very common and grave condition in the natural history of
patients with cancer. It is estimated that approximately 250,000
patients with cancer will develop brain metastasis in the
United States each years. Autopsy data have shown that up
to 50% of patients who die with cancer have evidence of spread
to the central nervous system, with approximately 40% of these
patients having a solitary or single metastasis . (Solitary
means that this metastasis is the only evidence of cancer
in the whole body, whereas single means that there are other
deposits of cancer outside the brain).
·
Tumors more
prone to brain dissemination are: Lung, breast, melanoma,
renal cell carcinoma, colorectal, sarcoma.
·
The temporal
pattern of presentation is of interest:
1.
Preccocious
(occult primary). Some authors state that up to one-third
of patients who present with brain metastasis do not have
previous cancer history, and in 16-35% of these patients a
systemic cancer is never found
2.
Synchronous
3.
Metachronous
(81%) Usually tertiary event: Short intervals (Lung,
melanoma, renal CC). Long intervals (Breast, Colon,
Sarcomas)
STAGING
Clinical Presentation: (the percentages vary largely with the published series)
Headaches
53%, usually caused by edema, CSF (Cerebral spinal fluid)
flow compromise, traction of pain sensitive obstruction like
sinuses, duramatter, blood vessels, or cranial nerves. These
headaches are typically worse in the morning, and increase
progressively in duration and intensity.
Focal
weakness (40%),
mental disturbance (31%), gait disorder (20%) visual problems
(12%)
TREATMENT
OPTIONS
OBSERVATION: Data from the early 1970s showed that with
observation alone the median survival for patients with multiple
metastases was four weeks, with the cause of death being uncontrollable
edema. If patients were treated symptomatically with steroids
alone, the median survival was doubled to eight weeks.
CHEMOTHERAPY: in general, it can be said that chemotherapy
treatment does not work. Only few agents cross the BBB (VP16,
VM26, Vinblastine). The biodistribution CSF-tumor is highly
variable, as well as the intra-metastatic drug concentration.
In 81% of the cases, brain metastasis are metachronous, often
after chemotherapy, which probably represents a widespread
drug-resistant systemic relapse
WHOLE BRAIN RADIATION THERAPY
Over the past several decades, whole brain external
beam radiotherapy (WBXRT) has become the treatment of choice
for patients with metastatic brain disease. From 1971 to 1976,
the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) conducted two
Phase III prospective randomized trials, in an attempt to
evaluate several treatment schedules. The results were published
together, showing an equivalent response to the treatment
in all areas, with no differences in duration of improvement
or time to progression within the various treatment schedules.
The median survival in these studies was 15-18 weeks, with
the degree of palliation being the same in the two studies.
From those studies, 30 Gy in 10 fractions emerged as the standard
treatment for patients with brain metastasis. In a subsequent
RTOG study carried out between 1979 and 1983, 30 Gy in 10
fractions was compared in a randomized fashion with the same
treatment schedule plus Misonidazole, a hypoxic cell sensitizer.
Both were equally effective, with an overall median survival
of 3.9 months. In these studies, a group of patients with
favorable prognostic factors was identified. More precisely,
those with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)>70, primary
tumor systemically controlled, and age less than 60 years,
with the brain as the only metastatic site, had the best outcome.
Accelerated fractionation and dose escalation have also
been evaluated by RTOG in a phase I/II trial for patients
with controlled systemic disease. The whole brain received
32 Gy given as 1.6 Gy bid (two fractions a day), with boosts
to the area of gross disease from 16 Gy to 22.4 Gy, 32 Gy
and 42.2 Gy, at 1.6 Gy per fraction, bid. The median survival
was increasingly higher, with no changes in toxicity. The
best results were in the 70.4 Gy group (Whole brain 32 Gy,
plus 42.4 Gy boost), with a median survival of 6.4 months.
Survival was significantly increased in the subgroup of patients
with solitary brain metastases treated with a higher dose
(6).
The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has reported
the results of a prospective randomized trial testing the
potential role of bromodeoxyuridine as a radiosensitizer.
Bromodeoxyuridine did not enhance the efficacy of the radiotherapeutic
schedule tested (37.5 Gy in 15 fractions of 2.5 Gy), despite
the fact that brain metastases have shown high labeling indices.
MORBIDITY OF WHOLE
BRAIN IRRADIATION
Acute: erythema in scalp, dry desquamation, hair loss,
otitis media, HA, nausea and visual disturbances, due to increased
ICP.
Early delayed: Somnolence syndrome (1-4 mo after XRT),
due to interference in the metabolic turnover of the myelin.
Long-term effects: The literature of the early and mid-80s
is flooded with papers reporting long-term side effects, such
as dementia, memory loss, radiation-induced necrosis, leukoencephalopathy,
in up to 50% of two year survivors. It is now known that WBXRT
below 60 Gy@2 Gy/fx very seldom produces radionecrosis, although
there is a strong dependency on the fraction size.
Very few patients survive longer than a year, so in
general, long-term effects are not a concern, with the exception
of patients with solitary brain metastasis. Because of the
relationship between large fraction size and long-term side
effects, the so called standard of 30 Gy/10 fractions is being
challenged; in modern research protocols that include whole
brain irradiation, the recommended treatment is 37.50 Gy in
15 fractions.
SURGERY
Potential indications for surgery (mostly true for solitary
brain metastasis):
·
Diagnosis (When
we do not have tissue evidence of cancer);
·
Solitary metastasis;
·
Life threatening
situations, or metastasis critically located within the brain;.
·
Recurrent or
persistent symptoms after non-surgical treatment;
·
Treatment of
complications (infection, bleeding);
·
Placement of
chemotherapy or isotope delivery devices (Ommaya).
COMBINATION OF SURGERY PLUS WBXRT
The potential role
of more aggressive approaches such as surgery and WBXRT have
been the subject of several prospective randomized trials.
The first one, carried out at the University of Kentucky and
reported by Patchell, showed that patients who underwent WBXRT
and surgical resection of a solitary brain metastasis did
better than those who received WBXRT only. In patients treated
with both modalities, the median survival was 40 weeks with
an actuarial local control at 70 weeks of 57%, compared to
15 weeks and 13%, respectively, for the WBXRT alone area.
More recently, in a Dutch trial reported by Noordjik, 66 patients
were randomized to 40 Gy at 2 Gy bid of whole brain irradiation
plus or minus surgical debulking . The results from these
trials showed that several prognostic factors for increased
survival were again identified, such as aggressive treatment,
controlled systemic disease and young age. Little over a year
ago, in a second trial the University of Kentucky evaluated
in a prospective randomized fashion, the role of whole brain
radiotherapy in patients with solitary brain metastasis that
had been completely resected was studied. The question was
to evaluate if whole brain radiotherapy was really necessary.
The results of the trial were very interesting because it
was seen that even though radiation therapy did not increased
survival, it did increase local control. When the data on
local control were evaluated closely it was found that the
local control offered by radiation was mostly in the tumor
bed and its vicinity. This has raised the question of local
radiation after surgical resection with three dimensional
conformal radiotherapy.
TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH SOLITARY
BRAIN METASTASIS OR OLIGOMETASTATIC BRAIN DISEASE (UP TO FOUR
METASTASIS): STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY
The most appropriate treatment for patients with solitary
brain metastases has been a source of controversy for nearly
two decades, and still needs to be defined. Recently, stereotactic
radiosurgery, an elegant, sophisticated and non-invasive modality,
has provided local intensification of dosage for well-defined
intracranial targets with relative sparing of the surrounding
normal brain. Stereotactic radiosurgery delivers a high dose
of radiation to a relatively small volume of disease, secondary
to the sharp dose gradients. Brain metastasis are considered
ideal targets for stereotactic radiosurgery since they 1)
take up the iodized contrast or the gadolinium so they can
be easily identified on contrast enhanced CT or MRI; 2) are
almost always spherical in shape, and 3) grow with minimal
or no infiltration into the adjacent brain parenchyma. Also,
with modern technology, they can be detected earlier, when
the volume of the metastatic deposit is still relatively small.
This has represented an attractive alternative to surgical
resection, and possibly Whole Brain Radiotherapy for patients
with oligometastatic brain disease. Stereotactic radiosurgery
appears to offer several advantages over surgery, such as
the treatment of surgically inaccessible lesions and decreased
acute morbidity, as well as the decreased cost of the procedure.
DESCRIPTION OF THE STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY
PROCEDURE
Prior to the procedure, informed consent is obtained
from all patients. All patients are placed on steroids prior
to and following the procedure. On the day of the stereotactic
radiosurgery, the Brown-Robert-Wells Stereotactic frame (Radionics.
Inc., Burlington. Mass.) Is placed by the neurosurgeon. After
frame placement, 5 millimeter thick cuts at 5 millimeter intervals
are taken throughout the cranium. After delineation of the
tumor volume and administration of Intravenous contrast, 2-3
millemeter cuts at 2-3 millimeter intervals were taken throughout
the tumor. These images are transferred to the radiation oncology
department via Intranet, with a DICOM-RT format. The tumor
volume and treatment plans are performed by the radiation
physicist, neurosurgeon and radiation oncologist, using the
radiosurgical planning system by Scandiplan (Scanditronix,
Ann Arbor, MI). Consideration is given to proximity of critical
structures (i.e., brain stem and optic apparatus), previous
radiotherapy, size and volume of lesion. At the end of the
regularly scheduled treatment day, the linear accelerator
is modified to accommodate the base plate and the floor stand.
Appropriate quality assurance checks are performed to verify
isocentricity and accuracy of set-up prior to beginning treatment.
Once all the verifications have been done successfully, the
patient is transferred to the treatment suite and placed on
the treatment table that has been modified to have the stereotactic
frame attached to it. The treatment machine will describe
arcs around the patient while delivering a high dose of radiation
specifically focused on the tumor. The procedure takes less
than 20 minutes. The frame is then removed and the patient
can be sent home soon afterward.
|